Wednesday, December 10, 2014

How to dare your local policemen who files false case against you?

How to dare your local policemen who files false case against you?
(How to get out of false criminal cases?)

Interesting topic is it not? Often time you will see the policemen supporting those who pays them the most or pays them periodically. You may see these more when you deal with real estate business people. For my share, I had such an experience, albeit a very interesting one, that I thought is worth sharing!!!

The real estate developer (who developed our gated community of villas) and couple of us on behalf of the community got into dispute… the gist of the dispute is that the developer didn’t want to transfer the corpus fund collected on behalf of the association, and also encroached into some of the park areas and sold it.  The community wanted to resist the same and thus the dispute started, and I happened to be in the middle of it!!! (as Secretary of the Home Owners Association).

As the dispute got intense, we decided to stop the illegal construction in our layout at any cost, all without bribing anyone:- ), that is the key!!

So, on one fine day the developer starts the illegal construction and we objected to it and called the Municipal Corporation, Police etc… we also stopped the materials coming into the layout for construction and tightened the security a bit. Though the Municipal Corporation officers came and verbally informed the developer not to carry the work, the Police didn’t do anything stating that it is for Municipal Corporation to take action (which by the way is not correct, as police have plenty of laws using which they can take action). Subsequently the Policemen colluded with the Developer and using one of the Developer’s employee they managed to file several cases against us.

While most of the cases were dropped at the investigation stage, since we were also resisting reasonably by pulling few strings here and there, the Police having taken money from the Developer had to file at least one case against us and send it to the Criminal Court! The idea here is not about winning the case, as there was no real case, but to use the judicial system’s flaws and harass us for years. The complainant doesn’t have to attend the court every time, but whereas the accused must attend the court almost every month even though the court doesn’t do anything with the case. It is for just giving attendance to the Criminal Court; a place you don’t want to be, as it would be missing all basic amenities of a decent office. And this is exactly why we are so scared of the Criminal Court. It is a simple harassment for years while the complainant enjoys his life, happily!! Most of the Criminal Cases are of this kind and that is why the success rate in Criminal Prosecution in India is @10%!!!

So, with the plan of harassing us, the police colluded with the Developer and filed a false case against us. They issued a notice u/s 41 of CrPC for personal appearance at the police station. We acknowledged the notice properly by signing on the back side of their office copy and also stated that we are willing to co-operate with the investigation; but since we have documents to collect, please send us a copy of the complaint and give us another appointment etc. We also send him a registered post with details on the incidents and evidences we had about the actual incident of encroachment. So, essentially we made sure on record, that the police knew of the encroachment incident and also that we are very willing to co-operate with the investigation.

As usual the police never investigated properly since it was just a false case. They prepared all statements and report simply by sitting in their office and colluding with the Complainant (who happened to be a lawyer), and the Developer. They used some names and addresses of the people and falsified everything and submitted a charge sheet (final report) to the court and also procured an arrest warrant. We then received an arrest warrant!! Think about the shock it gives to the common man!

We then approached the court and got the bail on the same day, as it happened to be a working day!! (If they wanted to harass you more, then they will do so on Friday evening or Saturday)

Having taken the bail, I didn’t want to go thru the harassment of trial court and deal with some low life people from the Developer Company. So, I decided to approach the law systematically. I did some research and understood the nuances of the law and process, took some case references from High Courts and Supreme Courts etc. By then the court has proceeded with the trial and the trial begun though not much happened. Armed with the research content, I put together a petition for discharge (Technically it was a release petition u/s.258 of CrPC, as it was a summary trial. In case of typical warrant cases, the same can be filed u/s.239 of CrPC) for reasons of “lack of material for prima facie commission of the offences” to proceed with the trial.

Though I drafted it myself, I was shocked to learn that my own lawyer had no clue if this was possible at all! I managed to convince him anyways and told him to just file the discharge petition and that I will take care of the rest. To my utter surprise, my lawyer was not able to file that application with the Court. Forget about getting a favorable order! Apparently the magistrate did not think that such discharge application can be filed since the trial started.

So, I took the application during the next hearing and spoke to the magistrate and the public prosecutor on the law but they were hardly able to appreciate the law! I then decided it was a moot point to talk to them about law…I then switched gears and requested that the application be taken and be dismissed on appropriate grounds as the court deems fit, since the court cannot say it cannot take the application as such. For which the magistrate and the public prosecutor readily agreed and magistrate took the application and then dismissed it via an order. We then appealed against that order at the High Court and got a stay order, until final disposal.

The meat of our claim was that there was no commission of offence, even if all the material taken together and the FIR taken to be true and that there are too many material on record to show that the case was a fabricated one. The High Court, after almost two years, agreed with our contention and dismissed the case against us!! So, our perseverance and the truth eventually prevailed. Though it wasn’t an easy thing to do, it wasn’t difficult either, and all thru we were very confident we can get it quashed!

The reason we were able to win are, (a) those who fabricates false case will always leave lot of loop holes in their documentation, (b) most police men and complainants do not know the law much and thus the combination of both makes it easier for us to prove a false case!! All we need to do is collect the evidences systematically, document it, support with good case and law references, and you are sure to win... if not the lower court, you are sure to win at High Court or Supreme Courts for sure!!

So, if you are in similar issue, then talk to me!!


I can also show you how to successfully file a criminal case against those who files false complaint and false police report to the court!! We can force a magistrate/judge to file such complaint on your behalf!! Can you believe that? It is true!!

Monday, November 10, 2014

THE FALLACY OF "PRIVATE" PROPERTY AND USE!

THE FALLACY OF "PRIVATE" PROPERTY AND USE! (Land, Building and such)
You might be wondering, what am I talking about? Private is private! What is not clear? I own it and I can do whatever I want with it! That is exactly what I used to think when I bought my first residential plot! I couldn’t be more wrong! I soon realized that “Private” property is anything but “private”: -)

A short discourse on property and ownership can be found at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/property/

The topic of property ownership and property rights is huge and they have evolved over hundreds of years and there have been numerous and evolutionary judgments on the same from Supreme Courts of India and other superior courts of developed nations. Review of these judgments is a pretty involved exercise and can get pretty deep that the readers herein may not be interested in. Thus we are going to stick to just some basic misunderstanding around this topic. But the gist of it is that many of us believe that private land and commercial building owners being private that the public has no right whatsoever to it in any form or manner. As a matter of fact one of my friend had hard time believing that we have any right at all against a mall owner to insist that he not charge the public a parking fee; as a rent or for the reasons of spending money to provide security and keeping it clean etc!

THE PUBLIC’s RIGHT OVER PRIVATE PROPERTY

The Public’s rights over private property in an important element that most of us are not aware and thus we never assert to such rights. The recognition and claiming of such rights are as important as paying taxes, protecting the environment etc., thus it is not just a right for the sake of it but an important component of our civic life. You will know why once you finished reading the below.

(1) Can a private or govt school close the school and start something else or sell it off for plotted development?
No they can’t. Through Municipal laws the city govt (on behalf of residents) have given specific privilege to that private school owner to construct and run a school for the benefit of the residents. Thus the use of that land has been fixed and also an expectation has been set to the residents around that area. It also automatically accrues value to the community around it. The existence of the school will bring more tenants and house owners to that area on the strength of the fact there is a school nearby. That is to say that the residents around that area have made indirect investment in that school and thus they have a say, an enforceable right, in what happens to that school and the land therein in the future. Thus, the private school (land) owner cannot change its usage without the permission of the community around it. If you live near such a school and face an issue of closure or change in land use therein etc, then you can assert your right to keep that school (with the same management or a different one) thru a court of law! Surprising, but is true!

(2) Can the government (city or state) convert a public park in your neighborhood into commercial complex/hotel/sports complex etc?
They cannot in general. In very exceptional case it can be done by following the due process of the law; which requires the respective development plan of the city be modified after calling for objections and taking into consideration of any objections (in judicious manner) from residents and public. No government has authority in law to just issue such a G.O or modify the development plan whimsically or for political consideration. Though there has been many instances of such G.Os., whenever such G.Os were objected and taken to the court, the court has always stayed such G.Os in every such cases!

Thus, if you are in a situation like that, then do collect sufficient documentation and challenge such decisions. Communities need open and park spaces and converting them into something else is a crime against the residents of the neighborhood!

(3) Can a residential building converted into a commercial property?
Absolutely not; unless the community agrees to it after following the due process. The due process includes making an application with the city govt for the approval of the proposed conversion, then the city govt must make public announcements of the same, hear objections, and then judiciously decide to accept/reject such application.

(4) I have a theatre/shopping mall/pond/lake/approved parking space/canal in my neighborhood that is valuable to me and the community, that either the govt or the private party is trying to convert into something else. Can I stop them?
Yes you can. As was observed before, all amenities of public interest that requires specific approval form the City Govt to construct or was a natural public resource (such as pond/lake/canal etc), then such things cannot be altered by anyone in vast majority of the cases. Very few exceptions are possible and in most cases both the government and/or private interested parties do not follow the due process of the law and thus, one can easily get a stay on such actions by govt or private parties.

(5) I am interested in building a commercial building (of any kind) with my hard earned and tax paid money. Why should I be restricted by the Development Control Rules, not allowed to change its use in the future etc? After all it is my private property, and I should be able to do whatever I want with it!
You couldn’t more wrong. A commercial property stands in a different footing than simple private property. Here are some of the key reasons for the same:
- Commercial buildings/complexes are allowed only based on development plan and thus it is something that is available only to a fraction of land owners.
- The infrastructures and funds required to make a Commercial building viable, such as broad roads, road connectivity etc is provided by the public and public fund. i.e the Commercial building owner don’t pay for everything to make it a Commercial building.
- Since only limited land owners are given Commercial building approval, for every such approval there are many land owners who are denied the same; due to the development plan that is created in the interest of the public at large.
- The existence of some of these commercial properties enhances the utility of the neighboring residential areas, thereby increasing its market price that a buyer needs to pay. Thus any changes to the commercial properties are not just a private decision as it affects both residential and other dependent businesses around it!

Similarly, restrictions are imposed on residential properties as well due to the above and the rights of other property owners and public in general.

Saturday, November 8, 2014

MATTERS RELATING TO PARKING FEES

I was amazed at how much we do not know about parking our vehicles in public road, commercial complexes, commercial shops, malls etc. Many of you may have seen parking fees being charged by many in cities c...laiming to have contracts with private owners of the commercial complexes, malls etc.

Can Commercial complex, shop, malls, theatre owners charge a parking fee?

No they cannot unless there is a special permission to do so from the respective city government (municipality, corporation etc). The rationale behind it is that the parking areas in all commercial buildings, complexes and malls are public properties for the benefit of the shoppers. All commercial buildings/complexes/malls are approved ONLY after they legally gift common areas and parking spaces etc to the respective city government who holds it on behalf of the public.

Even the contractors who collects parking fee for parking on roads must be approved by the respective municipality/corporation office and they must display valid contract and fees at all times.

Further, you may see some of the municipalities and corporations might designate sides (shoulders) of some stretches of the roads for parking and give out contracts for collection of parking fees. While this is OK for roads that were approved before 1950 or so, any road that was approved after 1950 cannot be legally used for parking unless it was approved as such using the law or statute that was applicable at that time. The reason for that is that none of the laws or statutes relating to formation of road and commercial development allows using the road for parking. So, it is normally not possible for the city government to legally claim a right to parking on public roads that were formed after 1950 unless it is proven that there was no law governing it usage at the relevant time. This is possible in some case since there was a vacuum of laws governing development till about 1970, after which most states came up with the “Town and Country Planning Act”. Before that they were mostly governed by the Cantonments Act and Corporation and Municipal acts that was applicable to big cities. The bottom line is that unless the city can legally make a case for usage of roads for parking, they cannot simply designate a portion of the road for parking as such and any such direction or notifications by the city government can be effectively challenged. And, yes the city government cannot get away saying that the shopping public don’t have a place to park their vehicle. The reason being it is the responsibility of the city government and the commercial property owners to solve this problem, as the common man and residents around that area have the right over the use of the road for commuting that cannot be taken away.

The concept of individual’s right of ownership and possession of property is absolutely a myth. A decent analysis of this can be found in AP High Court’s judgment in Ch. Madan Mohan And Ors. vs Municipal Corporation Of ... on 2 May, 2003 (AIR 2003 AP 393, 2003 (4) ALD 6) [http://indiankanoon.org/doc/34967/]. It is a good read for those curious minds!

Though some of the laws and statutes are different for different states, the overall principles behind it are the same and thus this is applicable in all states.

Saturday, November 1, 2014

Matters relating to Motor Vehicles and Driving!

Matters relating to Motor Vehicles and Driving!
I am assuming you are reasonably familiar with the basic laws and rules relating to Motor Vehicles and Driving, and that you make every effort to comply with the same. If not then please read below for references to all related laws and rules.

I.                  What you should know when dealing with Traffic Police or RTA Authorities?
Assuming you are a law abiding motorist, if you were ever caught by the traffic police or the RTA officers abusing their authority or illegally subjecting you to fine (challan) or detained your vehicle etc, then knowing the following will help.

(1) What is a traffic Challan?

   The term Challan is not defined in law. It is a practice or procedural term used by many offices and processes related to law enforcement and in courts. As it relates to traffic police, the term Challan means a notice of charge by the prosecution side (police). When a traffic police or an RTA (Road Transport Authority) officer issues a challan it merely means that he/she notifies you that you have violated one or more of the law(s)/rule(s) related to the motor vehicles. The Challan can be issued only by designated officers (per G.O referred above) and in most states it must be officers of Sub Inspector rank or above. When a Challan is issued to you, you are obligated to acknowledge it but not necessary to pay it immediately even if you agree to the violation.

(2) I received a Challan, What should I do next?
   Immediately upon receiving the Challan, i.e when the officer asks you to sign it, don't sign it. Be cool and request the concerned officer that you need to read it before you acknowledge it. In all likelihood they should be OK with it. Read it and ensure that you understand the violation(s) listed therein. Then you decide whether or not you accept the violations.

   If you accept the violations, and you have enough money to compound it by paying the same, then circle on the compound option and pay up the challan and get the receipt and move on. If you do no not have enough money then simply acknowledge the challan and inform the officer that you will take care of the challan in the next few days. Show him any address proof you may have with you (it is good to have one). At this time some police men might insist that you pay the challan on the spot which is illegal. What to do in this scenario is documented somewhere below.

   If you do not accept one or all of the violation(s), then you be sure to strike down the compound option by crossing it out and then acknowledge it and inform the officer that you will be contesting the Challan at the Court and request him to send the summon to your current address and show him your address proof if available (it is good to have one). At this time some police men might insist that you pay the challan on the spot and contest it later, which is illegal. It is not possible in law to pay the challan, i.e to compound the offence(s), and challenge it later. If you think logically is it not even possible to make a law like that. What to do in this scenario is documented below.

(3) Traffic Police or RTA officer insist that I pay the Challan on the spot. What should I do?
    It is your right to pay the challan or contest it. Paying the Challan can be at the spot, later at the police station or other designated offices (such as eSeva in Hyderabad) or if you received a summon from the court on the same challan then you could pay it at the court on first day hearing where you can simply admit the mistake and pay the fine. The decision is yours and yours only. The above is your right and no one can take away that right legally. Similarly, you have the right to contest a traffic or an RTA Challan and that cannot be taken away from you legally.

            Note: Once you pay the Challan there is no way you can legally contest it later, without substantial proof to show that you were forced to pay the Challan. Some cops say that you can do so that is not correct. Paying up the Challan legally means that you admit to the crime and paid the fine as per the law. This is called compounding I legal temrs. So, once the Challan is paid then it is not possible to approach the local criminal court to challenge it, since the Challan will be filed as closed. The options in such cases are, either to file a criminal case against the traffic police at the local criminal Court for abusing the authority, intimidation, detainment etc. or approach the High Court. You can also lodge a complaint with the govt or senior police officers for disciplinary action, and follow up on it, which eventually can be taken up with the High Court if no action is coming from the senior officers or the govt.

    When such a dispute arises and the traffic police or RTA officer insists that you pay on the spot, it will invariably involve the officer detaining your vehicle against your will and against the law. The police officers do that thinking either they have the right to do so or mostly they know that almost all motorists will give up and yield to their demand instead of fighting against that illegal practice. If you are faced with a situation like that then it is important that you stay calm and not offend the police or RTA officer. Spooking or irritating the officer is not going to help your cause. Take your time to calm yourself, digest the situation, weigh your private situation against your public obligations etc. Be sure to audio or video record the incident, if possible in secret, even if you decided not to fight against the atrocity. Mere sharing of such recordings with the government and the higher courts later would be helpful to the cause. We should always gather and share evidences as much as possible regardless of our intent to fight directly against such things.

    After clear thought and consideration, should you decide to fightback or want to group with like minded people and fight, then here is your goal: "to create enough evidence that you were forced to pay the Challan against your will and that your vehicle was detained until you pay up the Challan on the spot". Such evidences can be collected both thru the audio/video recordings as well as in the Challan itself before you receive your copy of the Challan. Remember that the Challan is in a booklet with carbon copy which will bear all your writings in it in the carbon office copy that would be useful to prove your case later, should you chose to contest it in court. You need evidence to fight and no amount of verbal evidence would help much, normally.

So, here is what you do to systematically collect the evidence:
      (1) If possible, audio or video record the incident.
      (2) Remember to make the decision to fight back or collect evidences before acknowledging (i.e signing) the Challan. If you singed the Challan mechanically then it is possible for the officer to just circle the compounding and insist that you pay.
      (3) Cross mark the compounding option in the Challan. It should be near the bottom of the Challan.
      (4) Select the option to contest, if one is available upon your careful perusal of the Challan. If no such option is available then write clearly (in white spaces available in the challan) that "I want to contest or pay the fine later".
      (5)  Then sign on the challan as requested by the officer. If the officer is still insisting that you pay on the spot, then you request the officer politely, officer, as per my lawyer that I need not pay right now but if you insist then you please state that in that in the challan by writing 'accused refused to pay, I detained the vehicle until the challan is paid' and if you do that then I will pay the challan now. If the officer is OK with it and writes it on the challan, then you collect the Challan with all those details and pay it now. Ff the officer is not ok then go to the next step.
      (6) Ask the officer that you want to write the compounding yourself since you crossed it earlier. Normally they need you to counter sign one more time for the compounding and thus they would give you the Challan book. Once you for the Challan book, you can simply the fact that "I refused to pay but the officer insisted that I pay the Challan on the spot or else he will not release my vehicle". use short form of that if required and then sign for the compounding and pay it.
      (7) Collect the Challan and on the back note down the officer name, location of the incident, name of the officer, designation, date and time of the incident etc.
      (8) Meticulously save the Challan and any other evidences you may have gathered.

Once you have the evidences, then you have the option of doing many things to set them right, some of them are:
     (i) Lodge a complaint against abuse of authority and illegal detainment with police higher authority as well as to the government (home department).
     (ii)Lodge a complaint with Human Rights Commission
     (iii) Lodge a writ petition with the High Court for declaration of the action of the police as illegal, claim damages (if you have suffered anything), if you have filed a complaint with the govt then you can also ask the court to direct the government to take action etc..

Note: If there are enough complaints to each of the above authorities then it will surely make a difference. Everyday millions of motorists are affected and thus even if 5 such complaints are made every day, it would make a big difference.

Further, if you are still not sure whether or not it is illegal for police officers to insist on the spot payment, then read this Supreme Court judgment, "P. RATNAKAR RAO & ORS. Vs. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRAPRADESH & ORS. [1996 AIR 2523, 1996( 2 )Suppl.SCR 866, 1996( 5 )SCC 359, 1996( 5 )SCALE386 , 1996( 6 )JT 624] ". You can download it from the internet. I am capturing some snippets herein from that judgment that are of relevant here. Speaking on Section 200(1) of The Central Motor Vehicle Act, the court observed:

          "It is not mandatory that the authorized officer would always compound the offence. It is conditional upon the willingness of the accused to have the offences compounded. It may also be done before the institution of the prosecution case. In the event of the petitioner's willing to have the offence compounded, the authorized officer gets jurisdiction and authority to compound the offence and call upon the accused to pay the same.".............
      
          "It is a matter of volition or willingness on the part of the accused either to accept compounding of the offence or to face the prosecution in the appropriate court."

 Thus, it is absolutely illegal for an authorized police or RTA officer to insist you pay the fine on the spot. The above judgment is only 3 pages if you like to print it and keep it for your reference.
 
(4) What is the correct procedure to be followed by the Police or RTA officers after issuing Challan?
     The authorized officers must specify a date within which the accused (Challan holder) must pay the Challan and if the Challan is not paid within that time then officer MUST file a case against the Challan holder at the appropriate court (traffic court). The Court then shall issue summon to the Challan holder to appear and either pay up the Challan or contest it. Contesting the Challan, if chosen, is same as any other criminal summary trials. If the accused chooses to contest and fails to prove his/her case then the court will order penalty and/or punishment depending on the violations.

(5) My vehicle is stopped by traffic police due to pending challans, should I pay it?
    No you do not. Only a court can insist, after due trial, that you pay up the penalty or go to jail. A Challan (compoundable Challan) that is not filed with a court within 6 months becomes invalid, as even a court cannot take up the case after six months. If a Challan includes an offence which is punishable with imprisonment, then it invariably has to be filed with the court as per the bar placed by Section.468 of Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC). Here is how S.468 of CrPC reads:

     "468. Bar to taking cognizance after lapse of the period of limitation:-(1) Except as otherwise provided elsewhere in this Code, no Court shall take cognizance of an offence of the category specified in sub-section (2), after the expiry of the period of limitation.

(2) The period of limitation shall be :- (a) six months, if the offence is punishable with fine only; (b) one year, if the offence is punishable with imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year; (c) three years, if the offence is punishable with imprisonment for a term exceeding one year but not exceeding three years."

    Challans are issued for offences punishable with fine only and thus they are hit by S.468 of CrPC in six months and thus no Challans are valid after six months if it is not already filed in a court of law and the court has issued a summon! It is  illegal to collect fine after 6 six months of its issuance by the police or RTA officers.

(6) I did not carry the documents (one or more of registration,/driving license/insurance/pollution control etc), should I pay the Challan?
    Not carrying these basic documents are not a crime but they are subject to validation. This is covered under Rule 139 of The Central Motor Vehicle Rules. This rule provides 15 days grace period for you to provide a certified copy of the respective documents to the officer who issued you a challan, upon which the Challan becomes void. The document can be register posted or submitted in person. The document must be a valid document as on the date of the issuance of the challan. For example, if you are issued a challan for not carrying the insurance paper on Oct 15th then the insurance paper you submit later must be effective as on Oct 15th or else you are subject to penalty under section 196 of The Central Motor Vehicle Act, as it comes under driving an uninsured vehicle which is a separate offence. Similarly if your registration is not valid on the date of the Challan then it is a major offence as such. But if you have valid documents then such valid documents can be shown/submitted within 15 days and upon which the Challan must be nullified.

(7) Police Commissioners or Police Department issued a statement saying that they are going to increase the fine amount. Are they authorized to do so?
                The power to specify the penalty mostly lies with the Parliament as is has specified the same for most of it. i.e the Parliament has specified a specific penalties/fine amount for most of the sections specifically and in addition, it has also added a general penalty clause, section S.177 of the Act that specifies a general penalty for offences under acts/rules for which specific penalty hasn't been specified in the act or rules. That means even the statement government has very limited authority to specify penalty amount and they cannot change the penalty amount as such. Most penalties are modifiable only by the Parliament. That being the case, the police department has no such power or authority. The only thing they can do is, if the fine amount was increased by the parliament then they may continue to charge the old and lesser fine amounts. Further, some penalties are specified as maximum penalty and thus, depending on the severity of the offence the police or RTA officers can charge a smaller amount but never more than what is allowed by the parliament.

(8) Should I carry the “pollution under control” sticker at all times? What if I didn’t have one?
                The law advises you to carry a certificate of “pollution under control” by authorized pollution checking agents. But not carrying the certificate or not doing the pollution check is not a crime as such under the motor vehicle act/rules. The reason being the crime is committed only when you drive the vehicle that causes pollution in excess of the allowed limits. The carrying of the certificate is only for the authority to decide whether a new test is required or not, as generally the engines might not go bad within six months. Even if you have a valid pollution under control certificate with you, a traffic police or an RTA officer can still direct that the vehicle owner does a new pollution check and submit a new certificate, if the officer suspects that your vehicle may not be in compliance of the pollution standards. The officer can do one of the following:
(1)    Issue a Challan directing the owner to conduct a test and submit a new certificate within 7 days.
(2)    Issue a challan directing you to produce a valid pollution control certificate, whether the valid one that is at home/office or a new one and it is up to you to make the choice and comply with it.
(3)    The officer can also take you to the testing center and conduct the test in his presence.
If the new certificate and or in person test shows your vehicle is not in compliance and your last certificate has already expired, then the officer can fine you as well as direct you to fix the vehicle and make it pollution compliance. The fine is u/s 190(2) and the fine amount is Rs.1000/- . If you have a pollution certificate that is less than six months old then the officer cannot fine you; but in both cases the officer can direct you to fix the vehicle and bring a new pollution control certificate within 7 days after that. If you do not comply then the officer can recommend to the RTA for suspension of the registration until you comply with it. Any time you drive the vehicle without pollution compliance, you are subjected to fine u/s 190(2) of The Central Motor Vehicle Act and once your vehicle registration is suspended then you will also come under more violations if you drive it around.

(8) I see motorists violating the laws all the time. Can I do something about it?
As a concerned and responsible citizen we can do plenty of things to bring about the culture of responsible driving and usage of roadways. I am reminded of the African proverb, ‘It takes a village to raise a Child’, which is very fitting when it comes to the enforcement of traffic rules. It certainly is not possible for the traffic police to monitor every part of the roadways. So, as a responsible citizen, you can do one or more of the following:
(1)    Put a sticker in the front and back of your car (large enough) that read “I Follow Traffic Rules”.
(2)    When possible, politely request the violator to follow traffic rules and point them to your sticker.
(3)    When possible, politely remind them of the violation they had just committed and point them to your sticker.
(4)    Have someone do video recording of the traffic violation or a picture which contains sufficient details about the violation and the identification of the vehicle and send it to the traffic police station or the traffic headquarters. If enough complaints are received then I am sure the traffic police will start utilizing that information for issuance of the challan based on such evidence.
(5)    Work with the traffic police department and interested NGOs to create and maintain traffic complaint portal (with appropriate systems and processes) for your area that enables both lodging of the complaints online with sufficient data by citizens, as well as enables the traffic police to review and issue Challan based on it.

II.               Basic Rules that all motorists should know.

Keeping the spirit of every citizen must comply with the law, every motorist must know and comply with the following basic rules:
1.      Registration: It is illegal to drive around a motor vehicle without valid registration. Every motorists must ensure that the vehicle they drive has valid registration. Loads or goods should not be kept on the vehicle in a manner that obstructs the visibility of the number plate, the headlamps/tail lamps or the registration number of the vehicle. If any obstruction of the registration is done a duplicate is to be kept in a visible spot.

2.      Car Insurance: Driving a motor vehicle without a valid motor vehicle insurance is a crime.

3.      Driving License: No one can drive a motor vehicle without a valid driver license. The driver license must be for the class of vehicle you drive. For example, you cannot drive a car with two wheeler driving license.

4.      Carry all necessary documents: It is important that all motorists carry all required documents. Though it may not be a crime, it is good to carry them for the production of the same when demanded by the authorities. Perhaps you can maintain a folder in the vehicle to hold these documents. The person driving the vehicle shall carry the following documents and produce the same on demand by police or RTA officers:
a.       Driving License
b.      Certificate of registration of the vehicle
c.       Certificate of taxation, where applicable
d.      Certificate of insurance
e.       For transport vehicles the following additional documents are required are, the Permit and the Fitness certificate.
Note: If the driver does not have the documents in his/her possession he should produce attested copies in person or through registered post to the officer who demanded it within 7 to 15 days as directed.

5.      Drinking and Driving: Don’t drive a motor car or vehicle if you have had drinks. Driving under the influence of the alcohol is a crime and is dangerous to the public as well as to you.

6.      Motor Bikes/Autos must comply with the same rules: Motorists driving motor bikes and autos seem to think that the traffic rules are not applicable to them. This is one of the major reason for traffic jam and accidents. Most of the time you will see they don’t follow the lane rules and cut in front of cars and heavy vehicles. They should not drive in between cars, especially in a moving traffic, and do not cut in front of cars and other bigger vehicles as it puts them in a dangerous situation (since the cars and other heavy vehicles cannot slow down or stop as fast as the motor bikes or autos. The driving rules are same for all motor vehicles.

7.      Driving in reverse: The driver should not drive the vehicle in reverse without first making sure that doing so would not cause any danger or inconvenience to any person on the road.

8.      Following Distance: Keep sufficient distance behind the vehicle in front of you to allow enough distance for your vehicle to stop if the vehicle in front of you stops suddenly.

9.      Do NOT drive on the shoulders (side) against the traffic: Never drive your vehicle against the oncoming traffic, to cut short the distance or for any other reasons. Even driving on the shoulder opposite to the traffic flow is illegal and dangerous.

10.  Do NOT drive with High Beam Lights: Driving with High Beam headlights is dangerous. High beam headlights are to be used only for signaling and on curves for signaling the vehicles on the opposite side for safety.

11.  Horn / Noise Pollution: Motorist should NOT:
a.       Sound the horn more than necessary for safety. Continuously and unnecessary sounding of the horn is illegal.
b.      Sound the horn n designated silent zones ( for e.g. near schools and hospitals )
c.       Use multi-toned horns that are harsh, shrill,  loud or alarming
d.      Use cut outs for the exhausts
e.       Drive vehicles that create a lot of noise when in motion
f.       Drive vehicles without proper mufflers causing a loud sound

12.  Traffic Lights & Signs:  Obey the traffic signal lights , the instructions given by the traffic policemen or by designated/authorized people in charge of regulating traffic

13.  Follow Traffic signage: Though we may have limited traffic signages, it is important that all motorist follow the traffics signs such as No Entry, No Stopping, No Parking, Speed Limit etc.

14.  Driving on Laned Roads: If a roadway has been divided into two or more clearly marked lanes for traffic, then please follow the following rules:
a.       Operate the vehicle as nearly as practicable entirely within a single lane and must not be driven spanning two lanes at a time, i.e driving with left wheels on one lane and right wheels on another lane.
b.      Operators of vehicles shall obey the directions of every official traffic control device that designates use of specific lanes.
c.       Official traffic control devices may be installed that prohibit the changing of lanes on sections of a roadway, and operators of vehicles shall obey the directions of those devices.
d.      A motor vehicle may not be driven or parked in a bicycle lane that is signed and delineated as a bicycle lane by official traffic control devices.
e.       In multi-laned roads, the left and right turns must be taken as per the traffic signages/directions of the traffic devices.
f.       Take U turn only from the right most lane. Never use middle or left lanes and take U turn by blocking the traffic (on the right side lanes). This is illegal and criminal act.

15.  Taking U Turn: All vehicles must take U turns ONLY from the right most lanes. It is illegal to take U turns from other lanes by blocking traffic on other lanes.

16.  “U” Turns:  “U” turns may be done only when
a.       Not explicitly prohibited by a sign
b.      Only after indicating the turn is being planned either through a hand signal or through the vehicle indicators
c.       After checking the mirrors to make sure there is no traffic from behind, no other traffic in front and it is safe to do so.

17.  Keep Left:  Motorist must drive as close to the left side of the road as possible and allow all traffic going in the opposite direction to pass on the right hand side.

18.  Turning Left: When required to turn onto a road on the left, stay close to the left side of the road and after making the turn continue on the left side of the road. (Do not cut across lanes from the right side of the road and then turn left).

19.  Turning Right: When required to turn onto a road on the right side, first approach the center of the road as safely as possible and then turn to the right and stay on the left side of the road.

20.  Passing: Motorists needing to pass traffic proceeding in the same direction must always pass/overtake them on their right side.

21.  Passing Prohibited: Motorist must not overtake/pass a vehicle proceeding in the same direction in the following scenarios:
a.       The passing/overtaking would cause inconvenience or danger to any vehicle proceeding in any direction.
b.      On bends/curves in the road or on hills or there are other obstructions present that prevents a clear view of the road ahead.
c.       If the driver behind the current vehicle has already started to overtake the vehicle
d.      The driver of the vehicle in front has not yet signaled that he may be overtaken.

22.  On being Overtaken by another vehicle: The driver should not speed up or do anything to prevent the other vehicle from passing.

23.  Intersections:  Motorists should slow down when approaching road corners, intersections, junctions or pedestrian crossings and not enter until sure that such an entry will not endanger the safety of pedestrians or people in other vehicles there.

24.  Right of Way: When entering an intersection that is not regulated by a traffic signal or by a traffic policeman and which is an entry onto a main road, the driver of the vehicle shall give right of way to the vehicles already proceeding on that road. In all other cases the driver is to give way to traffic approaching from his right hand side and only then proceed.

25.  Emergency Vehicles:  Fire Service Vehicles and Ambulances are to be allowed free passage and drivers of all other vehicles should move their vehicles to the left side of the road and give way to the Emergency vehicles.

26.  Pedestrians: Pedestrians have the right of way at uncontrolled and designated pedestrian crossings and thus the same must be respected by slowing down or by stopping vehicle if required to let the pedestrians to cross.

27.  Required Signals: These are hand signals to follow the rules of the road, in case of lack of electronic signals due to malfunctioning or otherwise. Very few motorists actually know the hand signs and use them.  It is good to learn them and be prepared to use them if you have any issue with your indicator lights or with your brake lights. The hand signs for the following should be followed if the vehicle brake/indicator lights do not work:
a.       When the vehicle is about to slow down
b.      When the vehicle is about to stop
c.       When the vehicle is about to turn to the right side or pass a vehicle on the right
d.      When the vehicle is about to turn to the left
e.       When indicating that it is safe for the vehicle behind to pass

28.  Electronic Indicators: Be sure to use electronic signaling system provided in your vehicle, instead of the manual signal described above and provide enough time for the fellow motorist to take notice and act.

29.  Parking: When parking the vehicle make sure that it does not cause any danger, obstruction or inconvenience for other road users. Obstruction of the traffic flow by improper parking is illegal and the vehicle may be towed away at your expense and also Challaned for the same.

30.  One Way Roads: On designated “One Way” roads drive only in the direction indicated on the road signs.

31.  Stop Lines: At road intersections, pedestrian crossings and stop signs make sure that the vehicle is fully behind the stop lines painted on the road.

32.  Towing: No vehicles may be towed behind another motor vehicle. The only exceptions are
a.       Mechanically disabled vehicles (to repair shop)
b.      Incompletely assembled vehicles (to garage)
c.       Registered trailers and sidecars

33.  Right of Way on mountain roads/ steep roads: Where the width of the road is not sufficient for vehicles to pass each other safely, the vehicle going downhill has to stop to the side of the road and allow the vehicles going uphill to pass.

34.  Obstruction of Control: Drivers of the motor vehicles should not allow any person to sit, stand or place anything that obstructs his control of the vehicle.

35.  Passing Pedestrians:  Slow down and drive slowly (not more than 25 KM) when passing a procession, meeting, troops or police on the march or road repair workmen.

36.  Loading: Vehicles should not be loaded in such a way that causes danger to other road users. Load carrying vehicles should not have anything extending outside the vehicle towards the front, rear, sides and should also follow allowed maximum height restrictions.

37.  Tractor & Goods Carriages: Drivers of tractors are not permitted to carry passengers on the tractor. Drivers of good carriages should not allow more persons than listed on the vehicle registration to travel in the cabin or take passengers for hire or reward.

38.  Dangerous Materials: Other than the fuel and lubricant necessary for vehicle operation, no explosive, inflammable or other dangerous substance should be carried on any public transport vehicle.

[Note: Commercial motorist may be required to comply with more rules. Please consult the appropriate laws/rules for the same]

III.          Freedom of Movement is a Fundamental Right
Right to "Freedom of Movement" has long been recognized as one of the fundamental (and independent) rights by the supreme court and the same has been part of Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (article 13 (1) ), as well as The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) (article 12 (1))

In addition, basic life is unfathomable for a common man without the freedom of movement with the aid of motor vehicles. Locomotion with the aid of motor vehicles have become both necessary and essential for the daily lives of people; going to work, hospital, school, shopping, business etc that could not be done without motor vehicles.  Similarly the "freedom to move" for an individual essentially means the use of private motor vehicles in many situations; which provides them most flexibility, albeit at a higher economic cost.

Thus, when a citizen's motor vehicle is stopped from going to its rightful destination, in the name of law enforcement by traffic police, it could mean a lot of hardships to the citizen; including a threat to his/her livelihood or one or more life may be put in danger depending on the situation. In addition, if the citizen was stopped illegally or wrongly (by mistake or otherwise) then it further leaves the citizen with bad feelings which eventually leads to disrespect to the "rule of law" in general, eroding the faith in the system and more corruption etc. It thus can be seen, what seems like a simple mistake or a minor corrupt action or ignorant practice by a traffic police has the potential to put lives in danger and also undermines the very fabric of our free society, the "rule of law". We cannot let that happen as responsible citizens of free society and we shall do everything possible to resist and set them right!

That being so, the use of motor vehicles have also brought in lot of challenges and risk to the society at large, in terms of traffic congestion, safety of oneself and fellow travelers and road users etc. It is undeniable that large number of motor vehicle drivers in India neither follow traffic rules and nor are they safety conscious. It is also equally undeniable that vast majority of the traffic police target gullible drivers and either take a bribe or challan them but not follow the due process of the law that must follow after issuance of a challan. They force the citizens to pay the challan on the spot by way of forced compounding which is illegal. The traffic police officers are getting away with such highhandedness and illegal acts only due to the lack of awareness by citizenry and lack of cogent and systematic action against such flagrant violations by traffic police and RTA officers.

    In what follows below, I am documenting some of the related legal stands, tenets and basic processes etc for the benefit of motorists and motor owners in the form of Q&A.   But before doing so, it is appropriate to look at the laws and rules related  to motor vehicles and driving.

IV.             Basic Laws and Rules governing Motor Vehicle and Driving
The following are what governs all motor vehicle related affairs in India:

(1) The Central Motor Vehicle Act (1988): This is a central act enacted by parliament and applies to all states. It covers most of the items related to motor vehicles, driving, licensing etc. It also specifies penalties for most of the motor vehicle and driving related offences. Where a penalty is not specified, Section.177 of the Act make a general penalty provision and reads as under:

    "177. General provision for punishment of offences. – Whoever contravenes any provision of this Act or of any rule, regulation or notification made thereunder shall, if no penalty is provided for the offence, be punishabl for the first offence, with fine which may extend to one hundred rupees, and
for any second or subsequent offence with fine which may extend to three hundred rupees."


    Thus, the penalty for the offences is mostly specified by the Parliament and state legislatures have very limited role as far as fixing penalties and/or punishments.

(2) The Central Motor Vehicle Rules (1989):  The Parliament, thru S.27 and many other sections of The Central Motor Vehicle Act, empowers the central government to make Rules regarding specific set of subject matters relating to motor vehicles and driving. Thus the central government has enacted this "The Central Motor Vehicle Rules" under that authority and thus is applicable to all states.

(3) <state>  Motor Vehicle Rules : Via S.28 and few more sections of The Central Motor Vehicles Act, the Parliament empowered each state government to make rules on related topics that are not covered by the central government. What is specifically covered under these state rules can be seen from each state rules. i.e Each state has its own rules on certain topics such as organization structure, hiring and many  more!

(4) <state> Government Order: Section 200 of The Central Motor Vehicle Act empowers each state government to empower specific state officers to compound offences under  S.177 to 182, S.183(1)&(2), S.184, S.186, S.189, S.190(2), S.191, S.192, S.194, S.196 and S.198 of The Central Motor Vehicle Act. Every state has enacted a Government Order (G.O) to empower senior police officers and Transport Officers in some case to compound the above offences. It must be noted that the compounding is at the instance of the accused citizens and is for the benefit of the citizens and not for the police. This is primarily to enable citizens to pay up the penalties, should the citizen agree with the charge in the Challan, instead of having to go to the court and pay. No officer can insist that an offence be compounded by paying the challan anytime. Neither any State and nor the Central government can make such rule. This topic will be exclusively discussed later. This G.O is normally issued by the state department of Transport and most of them are available online.

There you have it! The above are the laws and rules governing the motorists and vehicles in every state. Now let us move onto items of interest that frequently affects the common motorists.
Note: I do not believe in abusing the process of the law for the benefits of the motorist. We all must follow the rules and laws meticulously unless it wasn’t possible for some valid reason. If you honestly believe that you made a mistake or committed an offence then you as a honest citizen must abide by the law and pay the Challan within a week or so. The goal here is to empower to standup when your rights are violated and I hope you would abide by the law!